2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心！系列2

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心！系列2
Taylormade Qi4D LS vs G440 Max

Part I
今年最亮眼的應該就是Taylormade Qi4D了，全碳纖維桿頭，提升桿面強度和擊球回饋，改善擊球容錯，市場普遍反應也很讚。我也訂了一支LS來玩。另外Ping也是有很多鐵絲，今年也手癢買了G440 Max來進行桿頭比較。我沒有衝G440K，而是去年的MAX版本，因為我對全碳纖維桿頭有陰影，這次也就Qi4D和Quantum為對照組，看看桿頭材質差異對使用和結果的影響。

G440是我比較期待和想玩的一款木桿，從G410後我就沒有買Ping的木桿，這次G440也是1000k的高MOI，對於容錯是一般球友的救星。桿頭的外型就是典型Ping，桿面重心在中間，adapter設定在deloft 1.5度，配置Fujikura Speeder TR 569 S桿身，這是我最喜歡的一款桿身，性能導向，桿身回饋簡單，高強度碳布、倒旋和側旋都壓在最低，彈道中，這樣組合下會產生什麼結果？

Qi4D LS 9度，桿頭重量和G440 Max是差不多，都是200g左右重量，重心也在中間，桿面是相對深桿面，饅頭外型，對比G440是扁平寬桿面，完全不同的桿頭風格。桿身是用Fujikura Ventus 50S blue，市場口碑最好的一款桿身，長度在44.75“， 306.5g。G440 Max是44.80”， 302.7g。設定的規格是差不多，更容易看出差異的結果。

到練習場測試是中午，氣溫是44度F/6度C，下毛毛細雨。一樣先用鐵桿來舞一下，先打G440，打5球，再打Qi4D，5球休息。拿鐵桿練習，再打Qi4d 5球，接著G440 5球。因為G440沒有打的很順手，再打5球。結束收工！G440打下來真心覺得和我8字不合，應該說我打Ping的木桿都差不多，雖然G440真的不錯打，但我打中甜蜜點真的不多，低於50%。所以真的很掙扎！

可以看圖片瞭解，我中球的位置範圍有點大，中間有2球，中間靠根部1球，中間靠趾部2球。雖然後面有稍微好一點，但還是覺得難度比GT2，Qi4D要高。易打度和操控，對我來說是車尾，是這次4支木桿掉隊的。我個人覺得Ping這樣的寬扁桿面不習慣導致，其他品牌的桿面沒有這樣寬扁，我的擊球已經很精準，用G440完全沒有信心。我用Taylormade，Titleist， Callaway完全不會這樣。

請待續。

This year's standout has gotta be the TaylorMade Qi4D—full carbon fiber head, beefed-up face strength, way better feel on contact, and seriously improved forgiveness. Everyone's raving about it, so I grabbed an LS to mess around with. Then Ping dropped a bunch of new stuff this year too, so I snagged a G440 Max for head-to-head testing. I skipped the 'K' version because I’ve had bad experiences with all-carbon heads in the past. So Qi4D and maybe Quantum as the carbon head group to see how material differences actually play out in real life.

I'm honestly most excited about the G440—haven't touched a Ping wood since the G410. This one's got that 10,000 MOI monster forgiveness, which is a lifesaver for regular players like us. Classic Ping look, CG right in the middle, I set the adapter to deloft 1.5°, threw on my favorite Fujikura Speeder TR 569 S shaft—performance-oriented, super clean feedback, low torque, keeps spin and side spin way down, mid trajectory. What happens with this combo?

Qi4D LS is 9°, head weight around 200g same as the G440 Max, CG centered, deeper face, more of a "pear" shape compared to the G440's flatter, wider face—totally different vibes. Shaft is Fujikura Ventus Blue 50S—the one everyone loves—length 44.75", total 306.5g. G440 Max is 44.80", 302.7g. Since the specs are so close, it’s a perfect head-to-head."

Hit the range at noon, 44°F/6°C, drizzling lightly. Warmed up with irons first, then 5 balls G440, 5 Qi4D, rest, irons, another 5 Qi4D, 5 G440. G440 wasn't clicking, so extra 5 balls. Done!
Man, G440 and I just don't vibe—same issue I have with most Ping woods. Even though it's objectively solid, my center strikes were under 50%. Struggled hard!

From the dispersion pics (imagine the chart here), my contact was all over: couple center, one center heel, two center toe. Got a bit better later, but still felt tougher than my GT2 or Qi4D. Forgiveness and control? For me, it's dead last out of these four woods. I think it's the super wide/flat face—I'm just not used to it. My contact is pretty precise normally, but with G440 I lose all confidence. TaylorMade, Titleist, Callaway? Zero issues like this.

To be continued...

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心！系列2~Part 1
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%80%81zhongxin%EF%BC%81xilie2part-1

請待續。

Part 2
所以我G440會多打一輪，但似乎就這樣。不過，距離真的不差，和Qi4D是不相上下。更容易打draw，當然我的站位也有關，只是G440真的很容易打小左曲。飛行距離在220上下，滾動可以有20碼以上，真的很熱血！彈道是中低，倒旋真的低，當然今天的天氣也不容易飛遠。距離來說，就是猛獸！打下來，我中桿面的位置大多在中間稍微靠趾部，根部不到一成。

再說它的手感，桿頭回饋，擊球聲音很響亮，回饋感覺桿面材質強度高，很脆！沒有不好，是不同於Titleist、TM 和Callaway。它的回饋是在中球點的位置，沒有感覺到球彈出去或桿面的彈力。甜蜜點的感覺比較彈和紮實，是傳統鈦合金桿面風格。非甜蜜點是比較脆，也重手。回饋是沒有對錯好壞，以這4款木桿都很不錯，和以前木桿比，更有擊球樂趣。

Qi4D是整個桿面的炸裂，聲音也很大。完全顛覆我之前用TM碳纖維桿頭的使用經驗，這個回饋很像是另外裝的擊球聲擴大器。TM之前的擊球聲是悶悶的，應該是針對擊球回饋進行改善。對一般球友來說，擊球手感和聲音是打爽的唯一指標。我技術本來就不好，桿子打起來還沒有樂趣或爽度，就是自虐。而TM就直接回應球友需求，這樣就對了！

打2輪Qi4D共10球就直接收起來，球雖然沒有像GT2那樣Copy & paste，但球的容錯範圍就在一個距離範圍內。真的不需要擔心。而且就算打在非甜蜜點回饋一樣爽，這真的是打爽的桿子，完全沒有以前TM那樣難度。在飛行距離，也是在210～220碼，滾動可以20碼以上。如果是晴天，這個距離會再提升10%。果然是低倒旋桿子，彈道也是低！

穩穩的低，球速快，但我個人認為球速沒有GT2和Quantum快，倒旋低讓球就是衝不高。如果下場用比賽球可以衝高一點，桿面倒旋就是低，桿身回饋也很舒服，還可以感受擊球後桿身的前段部位彈力。整支打下來的樂趣真的爽，和GT2不相上下！因為練習場的球很差，所以下場的距離是肯定可以再衝出來，我在練習場不會打多，對桿面都不是很好。

請待續。

So yeah, I'll give G440 another full round, but probably that's it. Distance is no joke—matches Qi4D easily. Super easy to draw (maybe my setup too), but it loves turning into a little left hook. Carry around 220, roll 20+ yards—explosive! Mid-low flight, spin super low (weather didn't help distance today). Total beast on yardage. Most of my hits were center-toward-toe, heel barely 10%.

Feel-wise: loud crack, crisp feedback—like the face is super strong. Not bad, just different from Titleist/TM/Callaway. Sweet spot feels bouncy and solid, classic titanium vibe. Off-center? Crunchy and harsh. But feedback is feedback—all four of these are fun compared to older drivers.

Qi4D? Explosive across the whole face, huge sound—like they built in a sound amplifier. Totally flips my old TM carbon experience (those were muffled). They clearly fixed the feedback for regular players. If the club doesn't feel good or fun, it's torture—especially when your swing isn't pro-level. TM nailed what people want.

After 10 balls with Qi4D, I was done—balls weren't as laser-like as GT2, but stayed in a tight distance window. No stress. Even mishits feel great. Pure fun club, way easier than old TM stuff. Distance 210–220 carry +20+ roll. Sunny day? Easy +10% up. Low spin king, low flight.

Super consistent low trajectory, fast ball speed (though I think not quite GT2/Quantum fast—low spin keeps it from climbing). With tour ball on course, it'd launch higher. Shaft feels great, that front-end kick after impact. Fun level matches GT2. Range balls suck, so real course distance will be better—I don't beat up demo faces.

To be continued...

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心！系列2~Part 2
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%80%81zhongxin%EF%BC%81xilie2part-2

Part 3
整體來說2支桿子的使用操作上，Qi4D不需要調整，但G440桿頭應該要再加重2～3g，這樣可以提升桿頭移動的穩定性和擊球精準性。讓我的中球的範圍可以再縮小。雖然我打Callaway木桿長度在44“～44.25”，但Ping的木桿設計比較扁平，對使用視覺感長度配置可以更長些。這也是原廠配置的長度是46“，也是對應到桿頭視覺。所以球桿規格的配置，也需要看桿頭特性、和結構來設定。

不過這次的G440打draw更是隨手拈來，距離感更炸裂，球速像開掛的猛，完全就是碾壓我的G410。再說到Qi4D的表現真的就是“驚艷”！看了一些Youtube測試影片，大家對Qi4D的表現很像沒買，高爾夫就是黑白了。打了才知道原因。根本和我的Stealth就是不同次元，容錯低和距離一般，有時神來一擊爆遠！沒有迭3代以上是看不到明顯差異。應該說今年的G440和Qi4D進步幅度太大，完全碾壓同門師兄！

接下來就是把調整後的Quantum和G440 Max來進行比較，看看結果和感受是否有提升？而GT2和Qi4D會進行後續的使用數據比較。2支的使用操作上都沒有問題，就必須對擊球結果進行比較分析，看看哪一支桿子的數據比較穩定？這個月會對4支桿子做細節比較分析，同時必須調整球桿規格。下個月開場，就觀察下場使用分析，看看哪一支是實戰之王，哪支可以逆轉勝？

今年這4支木桿真的都太猛了，很難得4家品牌商的木桿都可以戰的如此膠著。這4支任何1支，如果放在以前，那肯定是那一年的王者。但今年4家產品都是絕對的王牌，無法說哪一支是可以碾壓其他，至少在今年是沒有。在擊球回饋、球速/初速、倒旋、飛行彈道、距離、容錯、非甜蜜點擊球等，這四支都不相上下。前提是必須提升桿身和選擇其特性！

在材質上，我個人覺得Quantum的使用，在擊球控制上有一定影響，尤其撞擊反彈的重心控制，在Qi4D這個全碳纖維桿頭並沒有這個問題。但這裡有個很重要的因素，就是“氣溫”！我從一月開始到現在共打3次練習場測試，第一次是Quantum孤支，氣溫最冷0～2度C，第二次Quantum和GT2溫度5～6度C，第三次就是這次，溫度7～8度C（體感可能在5度C，因為冰雪融化中）。

本文未完，請待續。

Overall control and workability: Qi4D needs zero tweaks. G440? Maybe add 2–3g head weight for better stability and tighter dispersion. Even though I run Callaway driver at 44–44.25", Ping's flatter design makes it look longer—stock 46" makes sense visually.

G440 distance feels explosive, ball speed nuts—big jump from my old G410. Draw bias easy. But Qi4D blew me away—exceeded hype. YouTube tests were positive, friends bought it, now I get why. My Stealth wasn't this forgiving or long—only occasional bombs.

Next: dialed-in Quantum vs. G440 Max comparison, plus more data on GT2/Qi4D. Both handle fine, so now it's about which gives steadiest results. This month: full four-driver testing + tweaks. Next month course opens—real on-course battle. Which one's the king? Which pulls the upset?

These four 2026 drivers are insane—four brands all neck-and-neck. Any one could've been "the" driver in past years, but this year? No clear crusher. Ball speed, spin, flight, distance, forgiveness, mishit performance—all super close.

On materials: I think Quantum's construction effects control a bit—CG rebound issues. Qi4D full carbon? Zero problems there. But huge factor: temperature! Tested Quantum in Jan (0–2°C), then 5–6°C with GT2, now 7–8°C (feels like 5°C with melting snow).

to be continued...

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心！系列2~Part 3
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%80%81zhongxin%EF%BC%81xilie2part-3

完結篇開始。

Part 4
溫度對於使用有絕對影響，同時桿頭材質對於擊球重心的影響是存在。但這個影響在氣溫如果超過10度C/50度F，相對的影響就變低，接近零。至少在最近2次的測試上，Quantum的材質對擊球重心的影響有明顯減少，而Qi4D是完全沒有這個問題。簡單的結論就是，桿頭結構設計問題，TM的Speed Pocket確實有產生穩定和吸收擊球反作用力。加上LS桿頭在桿面後方有15g的配重螺絲，穩定桿頭重心效果，完全沒有Quantum的擊球不穩定性問題發生。

桿頭結構和汽車的底盤結構是一樣意思，當車子遇到路面不平，或緊急狀況，要快速改變方向，如果底盤設計不好，車子就會失控或產生滑動，導致瞬間喪失控制能力。底盤面對地面的狀況和車子衝力/重力與地面反作用力，都要能承受和吸收能量，才能讓車子穩穩的行駛。桿頭結構也是如此，而且每次的擊球都是瞬間能量飆高，強度和結構不好，你就喪失操控球桿的能力！

Taylormade在桿頭碳纖維的運用已經非常成熟，從M6開始，就差不多已經運用碳纖維在主體，到Steal就基本全碳纖維桿頭了。以快10年的過程，在桿頭結構設計上真的沒話說，所以當其他品牌開始大面積運用碳纖維在桿頭上，產生問題是正常。這也是我認為Qi4D的使用並沒有產生像Quantum的狀況，因為之前已經繳過學費，也是Qi4d可以碾壓Quantum的原因。

材質對於桿頭設計與運用，影響擊球穩定性或操作性有限，但如果結構設計上沒有對擊球反作用力進行有效的控制，對一般球友和在低溫的環境下擊球，擊球不穩定性就會拉高，影響擊球精準度和桿頭操作能力。同時你無法握牢球桿/握力，導致桿面滑動，所以這個問題是有關人和桿頭結構設計。和材質運用，與佔桿頭整體比例關係有限，如此也把我心中的問題解決了！

2026 wood shaft material vs. head weight and CG! Round 2: TaylorMade Qi4D LS vs. Ping G440 Max.

Cold kills performance big time, and material/CG effects show more below 10°C/50°F—almost none above that. Last two sessions, Quantum issues dropped a lot; Qi4D none at all. Bottom line: it's more about head structure (TM's Speed Pocket absorbs force perfectly) + that 15g rear weight in LS for CG stability. No Quantum-style inconsistency.

Head design = car chassis. Bad chassis on rough road or quick turn? Car slides, loses control. Same with driver—impact is massive energy spike. Weak structure? You lose control. Materials matter some for stability/feel, but if structure doesn't handle rebound force well—especially cold or for average players—precision tanks, grip slips, face slides.

So yeah, that solves my material doubts—it's mostly design + structure, not just carbon vs. titanium percentage. What do you think? Anyone else testing these? Hit me up!

請尊重本站內容智慧財產權.勿未經洋梨高爾夫同意下進行非法轉載文章!如想進行文章轉載需求,請與下面電郵聯系!

大家可加入我的粉絲團,我會不定時將新的信息與活動發怖在微博與臉書，推特內.

Facebook/臉書上搜尋@peargolfcom就有洋梨高爾夫的粉絲頁。twitter/推特搜尋“@GolfPear”

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心！系列2~Part 4
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%80%81zhongxin%EF%BC%81xilie2part-4