Taylormade SIM2 Titanium 3W vs Callaway Epic Max 3W reviews測試比較!～上集

今天在室內測試一下2支今年的三木，一支是Sim2 Titanium，而另一隻是Epic Max 三木。都是原廠的桿子，沒有做調整和更換桿身的設定。我已經買了一支Epic Max三木要進行桿身和規格重新調整，所以這次的測試是有一個底，看要如何進行桿身選擇和規格設定？這次用的是Foresight GC 2擊球模擬器。在美國它是最大也是最多工坊用。精準度不會輸Trackman。

室內測試基本就瞭解桿子的特性，對於擊球的一些內容數據就挑一些做參考。尤其距離就真的參考。因為我的經驗是實際下場的距離和在室內的距離就會減個10碼左右。這是木桿部分。鐵桿就在5碼左右差異。因為室內是一個無風、且沒有把一些濕度等因素計算進去。所以結果會是一個比較完美的狀態。而一旦經驗多了就知道要減去多少，才是可能會得到的結果。

因為我的三木距離在200～220碼。但如果用鈦合金的桿頭就會比較遠，一般不鏽鋼的桿頭就在195～210碼範圍。所以我喜歡用鈦合金。一旦知道自己的弱點，就要想辦法解決和改善。所以我才會考慮買一支SIM2 Titanium來用。市售有鈦合金球道木桿頭的很少，以前還會有Adams會出，後來被Taylormade給買掉了，就剩TM會出。其他品牌基本沒有。或只能找日系的小品牌來用。

但成本上會稍微高一點。但易打和操控來說，我喜歡美系。美系在桿頭的設計、容錯和易打上要比日系好太多。日系優在手感和可以單買桿頭好處。至少我打日系超過15年的歷史和經驗是可以這樣下個結論。我現在也是持續用日系，如果我覺得不錯的產品就會買來用。我只能說，對於缺距離的人來說，鈦合金是一個方法可以提升。但成本會比較貴。至少貴不鏽鋼的球道木在3000～6000左右。

至於其他好處，我個人喜歡鈦合金的擊球手感。它的手感比較脆，感覺擊球有更多的紮實感。相較於不鏽鋼的桿面，爽度上可以說完勝。但如果一些設計不錯的不鏽鋼桿頭，打起來的手感也是很紮實，而且會有更多擠壓感。尤其是一些鍛造的不鏽鋼桿面。但不鏽鋼還有一個問題就是容易打破和打軟。尤其對一些有速度和力量的球友，這個狀況比較常見。鈦合金相對比較耐用和強度高的優勢。

我先試Epic Max三木，打起來很紮實的手感。桿子長度是43“，配置60g等級的桿身，選S硬度。SIM2 Titanium也是一樣的桿身規格。這樣試才能知道產品差異和桿頭的回饋表現。我是一支桿子打5～6球，然後更換另一隻，再打5～6球。休息一下，觀察打的數據結果。然後在進行另一回合的測試。一樣是內容和流程，只會測兩個回合。不需要多，因為這樣才是最真實的結果和你的身體對球桿的自然反應。避免身體去適應桿子。

本文未完，下集請點下方！

Taylormade SIM2 Titanium 3W vs Callaway Epic Max 3W reviews測試比較!～下集
http://www.peargolf.com/article/taylormade-sim2-titanium-3w-vs-callaway-...

Now it's been the middle of the year, today I am going to share the reviews of 2 fairway woods, one is Callaway Epic Max 3W and the other is Taylormade SIM2 Titanium 3W. It's the hottest fairway woods in the market and Epic is stailness material, SIM2 titanium is titanium face. Technically and practically speaking, Titanium one is able to drive 10 yards longer than stainless head. That's why I always stick on the Titanium fairways.

I already bought one Callaway Epic Max 3W but need to know how I should upgrade the shaft and specification? This time I am able to compare the two fairway woods then find out the best way to reset my Epic Max 3W. This time I am testing in the indoor with Foresight GC 2 launch monitor. Of course, the indoor is not like outdoor to get the accurate data but it's basic information to see how the woods can perform?

With my experience, indoor distance needs to be reduced about 10 yards for woods and 5 yards for irons. Since indoor has no winds without humidity to consider, the data is the perfect condition. Of course, I will use the right golf balls to see how it goest with the best results during the testing.

With the testing, I will testing each 3w for 5~6 balls and check the launch monitor's data then switch to the other 3W to hit 5~6 balls and review the data then stop the testing. Couple days later, I will do the same test again. Testing about 3 rounds within a week to see the overall data results. It should be the usual data to share to everyone.

I will not play too many balls per round since our body is smart to fit the golf club we are playing. That's why it's important to catch the true result and data without hitting too many times per club. In terms of 3W pricing, titanium fairway is about 30~40% higher than stainless head, of course titanium is better on the hitting feel and longer distance. That's why the price is different!

Epic Max 3W is 43" 15 loft with 60 gram shaft weight and stiff flex, the Sim2 titanium is the similar specification to compare. If the club specification is different on the weight, length and flex, you will get different result that is hard to make the right judgements. Epic Max head is little bigger than SIM2 titanium with vision. I have no problem on the size.

Taylormade SIM2 Titanium 3W vs Callaway Epic Max 3W reviews!～Part II
http://www.peargolf.com/article/taylormade-sim2-titanium-3w-vs-callaway-...

請尊重本站內容智慧財產權.勿未經洋梨高爾夫同意下進行非法轉載文章!如想進行文章轉載需求,請與下面電郵聯系!

本站新設新浪微博网?版：http://weibo.com/peargolf

手机版：http://weibo.cn/peargolf

大家可加入我的粉絲團,我會不定時將新的信息與活動發怖在微博與臉書，推特內.

Facebook/臉書上搜尋@peargolfcom就有洋梨高爾夫的粉絲頁。twitter/推特搜尋“@GolfPear”