Share |

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心!系列2~Part 2

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心!系列2

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心!系列2~Part 1
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%...

Part 2
所以我G440會多打一輪,但似乎就這樣。不過,距離真的不差,和Qi4D是不相上下。更容易打draw,當然我的站位也有關,只是G440真的很容易打小左曲。飛行距離在220上下,滾動可以有20碼以上,真的很熱血!彈道是中低,倒旋真的低,當然今天的天氣也不容易飛遠。距離來說,就是猛獸!打下來,我中桿面的位置大多在中間稍微靠趾部,根部不到一成。

再說它的手感,桿頭回饋,擊球聲音很響亮,回饋感覺桿面材質強度高,很脆!沒有不好,是不同於Titleist、TM 和Callaway。它的回饋是在中球點的位置,沒有感覺到球彈出去或桿面的彈力。甜蜜點的感覺比較彈和紮實,是傳統鈦合金桿面風格。非甜蜜點是比較脆,也重手。回饋是沒有對錯好壞,以這4款木桿都很不錯,和以前木桿比,更有擊球樂趣。

Qi4D是整個桿面的炸裂,聲音也很大。完全顛覆我之前用TM碳纖維桿頭的使用經驗,這個回饋很像是另外裝的擊球聲擴大器。TM之前的擊球聲是悶悶的,應該是針對擊球回饋進行改善。對一般球友來說,擊球手感和聲音是打爽的唯一指標。我技術本來就不好,桿子打起來還沒有樂趣或爽度,就是自虐。而TM就直接回應球友需求,這樣就對了!

打2輪Qi4D共10球就直接收起來,球雖然沒有像GT2那樣Copy & paste,但球的容錯範圍就在一個距離範圍內。真的不需要擔心。而且就算打在非甜蜜點回饋一樣爽,這真的是打爽的桿子,完全沒有以前TM那樣難度。在飛行距離,也是在210~220碼,滾動可以20碼以上。如果是晴天,這個距離會再提升10%。果然是低倒旋桿子,彈道也是低!

穩穩的低,球速快,但我個人認為球速沒有GT2和Quantum快,倒旋低讓球就是衝不高。如果下場用比賽球可以衝高一點,桿面倒旋就是低,桿身回饋也很舒服,還可以感受擊球後桿身的前段部位彈力。整支打下來的樂趣真的爽,和GT2不相上下!因為練習場的球很差,所以下場的距離是肯定可以再衝出來,我在練習場不會打多,對桿面都不是很好。

請點下方

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心!系列2~Part 3
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%...

2026木桿材質 vs 桿頭重量、重心!系列2~Part 4
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%...

So yeah, I'll give G440 another full round, but probably that's it. Distance is no joke—matches Qi4D easily. Super easy to draw (maybe my setup too), but it loves turning into a little left hook. Carry around 220, roll 20+ yards—explosive! Mid-low flight, spin super low (weather didn't help distance today). Total beast on yardage. Most of my hits were center-toward-toe, heel barely 10%.

Feel-wise: loud crack, crisp feedback—like the face is super strong. Not bad, just different from Titleist/TM/Callaway. Sweet spot feels bouncy and solid, classic titanium vibe. Off-center? Crunchy and harsh. But feedback is feedback—all four of these are fun compared to older drivers.

Qi4D? Explosive across the whole face, huge sound—like they built in a sound amplifier. Totally flips my old TM carbon experience (those were muffled). They clearly fixed the feedback for regular players. If the club doesn't feel good or fun, it's torture—especially when your swing isn't pro-level. TM nailed what people want.

After 10 balls with Qi4D, I was done—balls weren't as laser-like as GT2, but stayed in a tight distance window. No stress. Even mishits feel great. Pure fun club, way easier than old TM stuff. Distance 210–220 carry +20+ roll. Sunny day? Easy +10% up. Low spin king, low flight.

Super consistent low trajectory, fast ball speed (though I think not quite GT2/Quantum fast—low spin keeps it from climbing). With tour ball on course, it'd launch higher. Shaft feels great, that front-end kick after impact. Fun level matches GT2. Range balls suck, so real course distance will be better—I don't beat up demo faces.

2026 wood shaft material vs. head weight and CG! Part 3
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%...

2026 wood shaft material vs. head weight and CG! Part 4
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2026mugancaizhi-vs-gantouzhongliang%E3%...

請尊重本站內容智慧財產權.勿未經洋梨高爾夫同意下進行非法轉載文章!如想進行文章轉載需求,請與下面電郵聯系!

大家可加入我的粉絲團,我會不定時將新的信息與活動發怖在微博與臉書,推特內.

Facebook/臉書上搜尋@peargolfcom就有洋梨高爾夫的粉絲頁。twitter/推特搜尋“@GolfPear”