Callaway Mavrik driver review /1木測試心得！～下集

Callaway Mavrik driver review /1木測試心得！～上集
http://www.peargolf.com/article/callaway-mavrik-driver-review-1muceshixi...

Callaway Mavrik driver review /1木測試心得！～中集
http://www.peargolf.com/article/callaway-mavrik-driver-review-1muceshixi...

下集開始。

但這類桿子打平地球場會比較有優勢。因為性能可以衝到最高，但如果桿身的彈性被打彈了，倒旋量多了，一定會減低距離。所以我覺得需要配置中低彈道的桿身，來提升飛行和滾動效能。才能得到最好的距離效果。這種高彈道和低倒旋，在大陸型球場比較好，對於風大的海島或山地球場是一點都討不到好處。

因為一般球友本身的力量和速度優勢如果不突出，打這類桿子只有在前半年可以呼風喚雨、如魚得水。後面桿身力量衰弱了，距離肯定掉下來。也利用高彈道去的到比較好的飛行距離。所以也是一款吃桿身特性的桿頭。桿頭性能沒有話說，但桿身的特性會讓桿頭的性能表現上一個台階或掉一個台階。

再說到這桿頭另一個優勢就是容錯高，大MOI可以讓桿頭重量集中在底部，減低倒旋和提升球速。而Mavrik，在非甜蜜點位置的擊球手感也沒有太差。至少不是像Epic那樣鐵板一塊。更重要是它的側旋控制的相當到位。沒有產生大幅度的曲球出來。都是可以接受的小幅度側旋狀況。下場不會有出界的問題。

這點我覺得對多數業餘球友是非常重要。因為動作不穩定下。桿頭和桿面的容錯就是關鍵。像我在測試這些桿子時都沒有熱身，就直接給它摧下去，所以動作的釋放沒有做出來，導致球到尾端是帶一點側旋。而桿子可以不會產生大幅度曲球，就是可以把個人動作失誤問題給控制到最小。這是要給Mavrik肯定的地方。

對於飛行距離來說，我覺得它和SIM MAX是差不多。都是高彈道和飛行距離，對我來說在230碼多的距離範圍。但我用Mavrik可以得到比較遠一點，但都在5碼的誤差範圍裡。所以今年是有想要買一支Mavrik來玩玩，配置不同桿身來看看它的不同表現。

能挑的毛病就是桿頭設計有點弱。相對於其他Titleist， Ping、Taylormade的木桿外型，Mavrik就弱掉。從epic那種異次元的桿頭設計，跳到傳統風格的桿頭。這落差也太大了。當然外觀這是見仁見智。對我就有點重要。技術可以輸人，但桿子不可以弱掉！

整體來說，Mavrik是我近幾年來用Callaway木桿來說最好的一款。在性能和手感，再到容錯，它都是目前新產品的佼佼者。也算是callaway這幾年來木桿成熟度最高的一款。在過去的經驗下，把產品做得更加成熟和到位。也是我覺得Mavrik對一般球友有幫助的地方！

Mavrik driver is good to play in golf course as it is high launch head that helps average golfers to get the best flight distance. Moreover, the ball flight speed is fast and really makes your impact to the outstanding result. I would say you do not need to have good skill and stable swing to drive Mavrik. To make sure you can swing on the face of the head, the ball can deliver to the longest and highest on the air.

If you play in mountain or link course, the wind is big killer for Mavrik, the high trajectory will make the ball flight shorter with strong wind. I would suggest to select the right shaft is critical for average golfers. The head is good in performance, to fit the right shaft profile can make your ball flight stable and solid. Nowadays shaft materials can make the ball flighting better and reduce the back and side spins. Or even pick the low launch shaft to make the ball flight flat.

Meanwhile, Mavrik head is also outstanding on forgiving with high MOI feature, the head weight is concentrating on the sole to make the impact more efficient and productive. Even though it's not striked on sweet spot, the ball has small side spin to the end. That's acceptable as we all make the mistake and the head can make the misshot to the smallest damage.

That's important feature for the driver, as we are not performing the best and stable and the club needs to help us work out the problem and mistakes. I believe Mavrik is good head to help us solve the personal problem with our swing.

With the distance, I think it's similar with Taylormade SIM MAX driver. I would say Mavrik is slightly longer distance than SIM, but it's only about 5 yards differentiation. That's nothing I can complain but only the shape is kind of traditional design compared with other products.

I would say Mavrik is the best driver in recent 5 years of Callaway drivers, the performance, forgiviing and feel are the best in callaway lineup. You can say it's the advanced version of Callway Rogue. If you would like to get the best performance and result, you need to fit the right shaft to make the Mavrik become a monster. Mavrik is surprised me and it's worth to try in 2020.

請尊重本站內容智慧財產權.勿未經洋梨高爾夫同意下進行非法轉載文章!如想進行文章轉載需求,請與下面電郵聯系!

本站新設新浪微博网?版：http://weibo.com/peargolf

手机版：http://weibo.cn/peargolf

大家可加入我的粉絲團,我會不定時將新的信息與活動發怖在微博與臉書，推特內.

Facebook/臉書上搜尋@peargolfcom就有洋梨高爾夫的粉絲頁。twitter/推特搜尋“@GolfPear”