2025新木桿的特性分析/2025 New driver advantages！下集

2025新木桿的特性分析/2025 New driver advantages！上集
https://www.peargolf.com/article/2025xinmugandetexingfenxi2025-new-drive...

下集開始。

Ping就是不管別人如何做，它就是一直走它自己的路和風格。而Ping的東西就是要適合它們家產品的人打才能有效果，不然Ping的效果對我來說都不是最好用和效果到位的產品。它產品的質量還真讓我不敢恭維。而回到主題，Titleist的產品就是可以優化產品，讓一個技術可以進行升級。這是我最佩服Titleist的地方，也是可以從產品質量上看出來。

我做不少球桿，而對Titleist球桿的質量和公差來說一直都是眾品牌來說的優等生。這也是我一直以來，都會鎖定用Titelist的原因。同樣的錢，為什麼不買公差小，質量佳的產品。而titleist就是對很多新技術和新材質不確定性，往往都是最慢去接受的原因，一旦它認為新技術接受市場的檢驗和認同後，就會跳下去接受它，進而得到自己的產品技術提升。

Titleist的DNA是所有球具品牌裏最明顯和一致，它不管從多久的產品到現在的產品，絕對最容易去看出它產品設計風格和一致性。這點和Ping很類似，Titleist就是這樣對產品的堅持，所以喜歡Titleist的人就會很死忠，因為它很少跳痛，就算是利用新技術或材質也會是以Titleist風的形式下，表現出來。

這點可以去看Taylormade和Callaway的產品去比較，這2家風格類似，新產品的風格都很少會有和前一代產品有連結性或設計一致性。現在新的木桿設計就是圍繞在重量可以更加集中在特定部位，桿面厚薄度不再標準化或一致性設計，和外型結構強度提升等方面進行。而對於碳纖維桿面這部分，我還是不喜歡。因為手感、聲音、回饋上都還是金屬材質比較有樂趣。

現在選手的擊球距離比10年、20年前的遠10幾碼，所以USGA和R&A都在把球和桿頭的設限給極大化，我想以後的球桿可能會比現在的桿子要短一點距離，但易打、容錯和效能的表現肯定會拉到滿。這說明什麼？球友的練球時間可以減少，動作失誤球也可以不出界。真的變成一個簡單的個人運動，對人的能力也會更加友善。

這也是這個運動裏的球具發展是如此澎湃，新球桿每年都有，而這些球具是真的有效果？我只能說就我個人使用的經驗，效果有限。如果你的球桿是10年以上，那現在的桿子肯定比你手上的要猛。而你的球桿是10年以內的，基本可以跳過。技術和材質的成熟需要時間和不斷的改善提升，所以10年是一個好的檢驗點。而這也可以做為你選購新球桿的時間點！

Ping is a brand that sticks to its own path and style, no matter what others are doing. Their clubs are designed to work best for golfers who fit their product philosophy—if you don’t match their design approach, you might not get the best results.

Now, back to the main topic—Titleist. What I admire most about Titleist is its ability to optimize and refine its products, constantly upgrading and evolving its technology. This is something you can clearly see in the quality of their clubs.

I’ve worked with many clubs, and when it comes to quality control and tolerances, Titleist has always been one of the top brands. That’s why I’ve consistently chosen Titleist. If you're spending the same amount of money, why not go for a product with better precision and quality? Titleist is also very cautious about adopting new materials and technologies—they don’t rush into trends. Instead, they wait until a technology has been tested and widely accepted in the market before incorporating it, ensuring it actually enhances their products.

Titleist has the most distinct and consistent DNA among all golf brands. No matter how many generations of products you compare, you can easily recognize their design style and philosophy. In that way, they’re similar to Ping. Titleist’s dedication to its product identity is why its fans are so loyal—they don’t make drastic changes. Even when they adopt new technology or materials, it’s always within the framework of the Titleist style.

If you compare this to Taylormade and Callaway, you’ll see a big difference. These two brands have similar approaches, but their new products often lack continuity with previous generations. The latest wood designs focus on concentrating weight in specific areas, varying face thickness instead of keeping it uniform, and improving structural strength. As for carbon fiber faces, I still don’t like them—the feel, sound, and feedback just aren’t as enjoyable as metal.

Today’s players hit the ball 10+ yards farther than they did 10 or 20 years ago, so the USGA and R&A have been putting stricter limits on ball and clubhead performance. In the future, clubs might not be as long-hitting as today’s, but they’ll definitely be more forgiving, easier to hit, and highly efficient. What does that mean? Golfers will need less practice time, mishits will stay in play, and the game will become even more accessible.

That’s why golf equipment innovation is so fast-paced—there are new clubs every year. But do they really make a difference? From my experience, the improvements are limited. If your clubs are over 10 years old, then yes, the new ones will be noticeably better. But if your clubs are less than 10 years old, you can probably skip the latest releases. Technology and materials take time to mature and improve, so a 10-year cycle is a good benchmark for upgrading. That’s something to keep in mind when buying new clubs!

請尊重本站內容智慧財產權.勿未經洋梨高爾夫同意下進行非法轉載文章!如想進行文章轉載需求,請與下面電郵聯系!

本站在Facebook/臉書上的帳號被駭了，所以乾脆就結束。要申訴太累也沒有對應程序，就把內容放著本站裏。感謝大家支持。謝謝